stance, never to suggest that we should abandon science and engineering and retreat for some idealized pastoral previous that never really existed, for that would be to ignore the real advantages that progress has bestowed—the alleviation of suffering through anesthesia, the capability to speak to a loved one across an ocean, the near-eradication of specific diseases, the intellectual pleasure of understanding the cosmos—but instead to supporter for a more mature, more nuanced, and ultimately more responsible knowledge of what development suggests, the one that acknowledges its inherently dialectical nature, their tendency to make a new synthesis that contains both thesis of their gain and the antithesis of its price, a knowledge that progress is less about reaching your final state of excellence and more about moving a continuous series of trade-offs, of handling
the consequences of our own power and ingenuity. This calls for a shift in our considering from the mind-set of conquest to one of stewardship, from viewing the entire world as a challenge to be resolved through sheer power of intellect to seeing it as a sophisticated, interconnected system that we are part and with which we ought to find a powerful and sustainable equilibrium, this means that each invention, from a brand new social networking system to a fresh genetic design process, should be examined not only for the immediate electricity and income possible but also for its long-term, second-order results on the mental, cultural, and ecological techniques it'll inevitably modify, it needs that people cultivate a new virtue for the present day era: the virtue of foresight, the humble recognition of our personal fallibility, and the honest courage to sometimes forego a specific type of power or convenience
in the title of preserving something more fragile and ultimately more important, be it individual dignity, democratic reliability, or planetary health. The 오피스타 way of measuring our progress in the 21st century, thus, may possibly not be present in the rate of our microprocessors or the achieve of our networks, but in our collective knowledge, inside our capacity to look clearly at the double-edged sword of our personal achievements and to wield it with a profound sense of responsibility, realizing that probably the most significant advancement we could produce is to evolve our personal mind to match our scientific expertise, to produce the ethical and rational structure essential to control the
immense forces we've previously unleashed, for the path ahead is not a pre-ordained ascent but a winding walk we are positively blazing with every decision we produce, and the location is not really a utopian town on a mountain but a perpetual, cautious, and profoundly clever discussion with the future, another whose form depends entirely on whether we could finally release the reassuring mythic of linear progress and accept the more difficult, more ambiguous, but ultimately more actual story of our constant, complicated, and responsibility-laden dance with the results of our own cleverness.